🔗 Share this article

Following a significant legal reversal, a national review panel has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Case and Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the regulator to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on a separate video—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or offensive, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated widespread discussion". X even compared the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board revised the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the panel disagreed, contending the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was released years after the assassination, "after public sentiment around the matter had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the ruling.

"X fought this case to defend free speech and the importance of access to information about issues of public interest. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the board's decision, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.